HealthCare Professionals and Parent Groups Start Petition Seeking Ban on Taste-T App

Taste-T, the app designed to help you like the taste of foods you normally don’t care for, may be the biggest Ceremplant hit of the year, but not everyone is singing its praises. A coalition of healthcare professionals and parent groups have started a petition to have the popular app banned, and raise awareness to the “real and serious dangers of using Taste-T.” The app’s creator says the technology is safe, and poses no danger when used as released. Ceremplant officials say they are looking into the matter.

Alex James is no stranger to ceremplant users. His “Emotional Compass” (EC) app took the Ceremplant world by storm back in 2034, and still remains one of the most popular apps for users of the ubiquitous implants. Taste-T has sold twice as fast as EC in its first year. “I got the idea from my nephew who famously hates the taste of peppers. He wouldn’t touch anything with peppers in it, no matter how delicious. I wondered how hard it would be to train someone to associate a flavor they didn’t like with a flavor they did. I started investigating if you could transform a “bad flavor” reaction in the brain with a “good flavor” reaction, targeting specific areas with electrical stimulation. I learned quickly that there wasn’t much scientific study done in the area. If it wasn’t for the amazing work of Dr. Adler Walters, I’d still be working on the software. His discoveries about how the brain responds to taste, while working on the kükenroot, and his database of compounds found in edible plants, was vital to the development of Taste-T.”

Taste-T transforms the brain’s response to an unliked food to one that a user finds delicious, over the course of a few days. Once properly calibrated, the taste of every food can be your favorite. With record sales it looked like Taste-T was well on its way to be the most popular app ever made for the Ceremplant. However, users began to exploit an unfortunate flaw in the program, which allowed users to greatly enhance the brain’s pleasure response to certain flavors.

Soon, many were using “enhanced” versions of the app. Healthcare professionals say that using the enhanced version of Taste-T can be dangerous. While most experience a mild euphoria, a sense of relaxation, or an altered perception of time when tasting specific foods, many can experience much more drastic effects when eating certain items, particularly with first time users. Instead of relaxation and euphoria, some users can experience aggresiveness (asparagus), fear (tuna), or feelings of distrust (SSHAM). In extreme cases the altered app can lead to long-lasting disorders or even permanent rewiring of the brain according to some in the medical community. While Alex has since upgraded Taste-T to disable the exploit, parent groups say that it is easy enough to rollback the software to an earlier version if you know where to look. They say the potential for abuse is too high, and they want the app pulled from stores.

Well known Lahaina restaurateur and business owner Bob Abramo has banned anyone using the app from dining in his famous Chop House. “I take the art of grilling and preparing meat seriously, and want customers who appreciate the true taste of our offerings. Meat tastes good without the use of Taste-T, although I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t a little intrigued. I bet you could even make people taste like cured pork belly with the app, if you wanted.”

“It’s the kind of thing you think only happens to other families, not your own,” says one of the most vocal critics of Taste-T, 40-year-old mother Brenda Ronner. “My son Max never liked the taste of onions. It wasn’t an issue when he was younger, but as he grew up it started to become a real problem. Just about everything has onions in it, and he’d spend hours a week meticulously picking them out of food. We had to avoid certain restaurants all together because of their limited onion-free options. On his 12th birthday his father and I decided to finally do something about it, and get him the Taste-T app.” Brenda says it was one of the worst decisions of her life.

“Everything seemed fine for a few weeks. We went through the calibration phase, and soon he was loving the taste of: onions, shallots, chives, leeks, and even garlic. Our food options and future seemed wide open, but Max started hanging around with a bad crowd at school, biohacker Taste-T vegetarian kids with wifi studs in their foreheads, and LED eyebrows. His grades began to slip, and I started noticing onion skins in his room, but I didn’t think much of it at the time. Then he was caught trying to steal a head of garlic from the store, and the truth came out. Those kids had done something to his app, and he had been on a tasting binge for months. We took him to the doctor, and applied the upgrade. I thought I had my old Max back again, but I was wrong. A few weeks later, I came home early, and heard music blaring from his room. I could smell the onions halfway up the stairs, despite the towel he had put at the bottom of his door. What I saw will be burned into my mind forever. The reggae music was deafening, and there were half-chewed leeks everywhere. I even found a shallot in his underwear drawer. He was sitting in his chair with his eyes rolled back in his head, licking the biggest vidalia onion I’d ever seen. He was so out of it, he barely moved when I screamed his name. I want to save other mothers from seeing their sons like that.”

Brenda says they’ve had to enroll Max into an institutional learning facility equipped to deal with the issues caused by his Taste-T app, and she is not alone. Hundreds have claimed to have similar experiences to the Ronners, and many healthcare professionals say the potential for harm is high for those using the app. Ceremplant says they take their customer’s health and well-being seriously, and will address the petition after a thorough review of Taste-T, and their third party app policy.

Case highlights lingering legal questions about veil travel

Last year 181 countries came together to sign the Gateway Travel accord, making veil travel legal across most of the world. The agreement set rules about trade between countries, addressed questions about the type of goods that could be moved across borders, and established guidelines about sharing information. Veil travel is easily the most popular way to get around, but the accord covers only international travel. Here in the United States many legal questions and court challenges remain. Two recent cases show that the law still needs time to properly address a few issues involved with veil travel.

By all accounts 24-year-old Grit Howard is a typical young man growing up in Louisiana. What makes him special, is that he is the focus of a legal battle that has the potential to shape case law regarding veil travel for years to come. Many legal experts say that the growth in popularity of gateway technology has far exceeded the ability of the law to keep up, leaving many important questions unanswered. Veilcorp says his case and others like it are a result of confusion about how the veil process works.

Two years ago Grit was charged with criminal trespassing after he and his friends broke into a construction site in order to take “daredevil” pictures of themselves dangling off the building. He was fined, ordered to maintain lawful employment, and given 3 years probation. For over 20 months Grit kept his nose clean and kept his job as ordered. It is the location of his job that has landed him in legal trouble. For years he has been using the veil to travel to the oil rigs over 100 miles away from his home, a distance that officials say is out of the area he was ordered to stay as part of his probation.

“The problem here is that my probation officer is Kenny Jolivet. We grew up in the same parish and he always had it out for me. He was a miserable kid. Kenny was the kind of kid who was always picked last, if he was picked at all. But he was good at picking his nose, he always had that going for him. It’s not like I’m the first person to work the rigs on probation. I asked him if it was alright and he gave me permission. He said because I was veiling there I didn’t need anything in writing because I wasn’t actually traveling that far. I was just walking through the gateway. He said it’d be different if I was driving. It sounded about right to me. It’s not my fault that he’s still holding a kickball grudge. I should have known that something was wrong when he kept calling my girlfriend late at night to talk about the “special terms” of my probation. I hope they’re happy together,” Howard says.

Veilcorp Spokesperson Lisa Hunt says that the special nature of veil travel shouldn’t affect jurisdictions or personal travel restrictions. “Unfortunately for Mr. Howard and others like him, the law hasn’t quite kept up with our technological progress. The exact workings of veil travel can be confusing and I think some of these cases are a result of misunderstandings. As we’ve said time and time again, the same laws that would apply to someone flying apply to someone using our technology. The only difference is that flying requires you to show up 2 hours early, have strangers in uniforms grope you, sit in a tube with air that smells like garlic infused whiskey, and endure having the back of your seat kicked by unruly children. Mr. Howard’s case is regrettably not the only one involving misconceptions about the travel process. The recent case in Michigan highlights just how poorly understood it is.”

Hunt is referring to the story of Brenda Ronner and her brother Tedd. Ronner’s case dominated the headlines earlier this year when she claimed that her brother violated a restraining order when he veiled at the same time she did. The case made it all the way to the Michigan Supreme court. Tedd was ultimately acquitted after it was decided that traveling through the matter stream at the same time did not violate the 150 yard distance he was ordered to stay away.

While many considered the case a stretch, the fact that it was accepted by the high court highlights how many issues remain in a grey area: Is the matter stream a new jurisdiction? What laws apply to an individual during the veiling process? At what point does the jurisdiction between states change, if at all, when traveling through the veil? While there seems to be plenty of legal questions about veil travel domestically, one things seems clear, they won’t be answered anytime soon. Grit’s case is still in the appeal process and experts say many more like it are sure to come.